District of Columbia K–6 social studies standards
District of Columbia writes its own social studies standards. They are published as Washington, DC K-12 Social Studies Standards, adopted 2023 and are not a version of a national framework. 194 of 313 are matched to a national standard.
CSP's "Social Studies (2023-)" family carries the March 2023 DRAFT revision, not the adopted June 2023 standards (276/311 CSP rows match the draft PDF; only 78 match the adopted one). Extracted from OSSE's adopted document instead. OSSE publishes two renderings whose defects do not overlap: "Standards in English" substitutes capital P/Y, "Adopted Standards" drops fi/ff/fl ligatures — the extractor takes text from the first and repairs its 26 substituted capitals against the second, per word and on evidence.
- Framework
- Washington, DC K-12 Social Studies Standards
- Adopted
- June 21, 2023
- Source last checked
- July 23, 2026
313 standards, kindergarten through 6th grade
- K.1K
- K.2K
- K.3K
- K.4K
- K.5K
- K.6K
- K.7K
- K.8K
- K.9K
- K.10K
- K.11K
- K.12K
- K.13K
- K.14K
- K.15K
- K.16K
- K.17K
- K.18K
- K.19K
- K.20K
- K.21K
- K.22K
- K.23K
- K.24K
- K.25K
- K.26K
- K.27K
- 1.11
- 1.21
- 1.31
- 1.41
- 1.51
- 1.61
- 1.71
- 1.81
- 1.91
- 1.101
- 1.111
- 1.121
- 1.131
- 1.141
- 1.151
- 1.161
- 1.171
- 1.181
- 1.191
- 1.201
- 1.211
- 1.221
- 1.231
- 1.241
- 1.251
- 1.261
- 1.271
- 1.281
- 1.291
- 1.301
- 1.311
- 1.321
- 1.331
- 1.341
- 1.351
- 2.12
- 2.22
- 2.32
- 2.42
- 2.52
- 2.62
- 2.72
- 2.82
- 2.92
- 2.102
- 2.112
- 2.122
- 2.132
- 2.142
- 2.152
- 2.162
- 2.172
- 2.182
- 2.192
- 2.202
- 2.212
- 2.222
- 2.232
- 2.242
- 2.252
- 2.262
- 2.272
- 2.282
- 2.292
- 2.302
- 2.312
- 2.322
- 3.13
- 3.23
- 3.33
- 3.43
- 3.53
- 3.63
- 3.73
- 3.83
- 3.93
- 3.103
- 3.113
- 3.123
- 3.133
- 3.143
- 3.153
- 3.163
- 3.173
- 3.183
- 3.193
- 3.203
- 3.213
- 3.223
- 3.233
- 3.243
- 3.253
- 3.263
- 3.273
- 3.283
- 3.293
- 3.303
- 3.313
- 3.323
- 3.333
- 3.343
- 3.353
- 3.363
- 3.373
- 3.383
- 3.393
- 3.403
- 3.413
- 3.423
- 4.14
- 4.24
- 4.34
- 4.44
Compare different theories about how and when people began to migrate around the globe and populate the Americas (e.g., land-bridge theory, the Founding of the United States the Founding of the United States Beringia, Yana Rhinoceros Horn Site and evidence of mammoth hunting, coastal-route theory, Clovis sites).
- 4.54
- 4.64
- 4.74
Analyze the development of physical documentation in the early Americas, such as the writing and iconographic systems of Indigenous peoples across the Americas to make claims about historic societies (e.g., Cave of the Painted Rock in current-day Brazil, the writing system developed by the Maya, glyphs of the Grand Canyon).
- 4.84
- 4.94
- 4.104
- 4.114
- 4.124
- 4.134
- 4.144
- 4.154
- 4.164
- 4.174
Evaluate the limitations of using European source material and terminology to understand the history of Indigenous Peoples (e.g., use of the word “savage,” ideas that perpetuate a false hierarchy for human beings, limitations of European understandings of Indigenous cultures, limitations of European understanding of Two-Spirit identities).
- 4.184
- 4.194
- 4.204
- 4.214
- 4.224
- 4.234
- 4.244
- 4.254
- 4.264
- 4.274
- 4.284
- 4.294
- 4.304
- 4.314
- 4.324
- 4.334
- 4.344
- 4.354
- 4.364
- 4.374
- 4.384
- 4.394
Analyze the different perspectives and reactions of people across the Colonies to British actions and revolution (e.g., “Patriots,” “Loyalists,” people from different racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic statuses and different Indigenous Nations). the Founding of the United States the Founding of the United States
- 4.404
- 4.414
- 4.424
- 4.434
- 4.444
- 4.454
- 4.464
- 4.474
- 4.484
- 4.494
- 4.504
- 4.514
- 4.524
- 4.534
- 4.544
- 5.15
- 5.25
- 5.35
- 5.45
- 5.55
- 5.65
- 5.75
- 5.85
- 5.95
- 5.105
- 5.115
- 5.125
- 5.135
- 5.145
- 5.155
- 5.165
- 5.175
- 5.185
- 5.195
- 5.205
- 5.215
- 5.225
- 5.235
- 5.245
- 5.255
- 5.265
- 5.285
- 5.295
- 5.305
- 5.315
- 5.325
- 5.335
- 5.345
- 5.355
- 5.365
- 5.375
- 5.385
- 5.395
- 5.405
- 5.415
- 5.425
- 5.435
- 5.445
- 5.455
- 5.465
Analyze changes at home as the US mobilized for and entered World War II, including social, economic, and political wartime opportunities for women and communities of color (e.g., women of color as riveters and war material assembly workers, Japanese American interpreters, Navajo coders, Tuskegee Airmen).
- 5.475
- 5.485
- 5.495
- 5.505
- 5.515
Evaluate different strategies for resistance to Jim Crow laws in the South in the 20 century, such as boycotts, legal battles and direct action organized by grassroots groups such as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) and the Congress for Racial Equality (CORE).
- 5.525
- 5.535
- 5.545
Compare the efforts and impact of diverse groups and organizations inspired by the African American Civil Rights movement to address inequalities in American society including but not limited to the gay rights movement, the Stonewall Uprising, the American Indian Movement (AIM), the United Farm Workers, the Women’s Liberation Movement, the Asian American Movement, the Disability Rights Movement, the Chicano Movement and Latinx resistance.
- 5.555
- 5.565
- 6.16
- 6.26
- 6.36
- 6.46
- 6.56
- 6.66
- 6.76
- 6.86
- 6.96
- 6.106
- 6.116
- 6.126
- 6.136
- 6.146
- 6.156
- 6.166
- 6.176
- 6.186
- 6.196
- 6.206
- 6.216
- 6.226
- 6.236
- 6.246
- 6.256
- 6.266
- 6.276
- 6.286
- 6.296
- 6.306
- 6.316
- 6.326
- 6.336
- 6.346
- 6.356
- 6.366
- 6.376
- 6.386
- 6.396
- 6.406
- 6.416
- 6.426
- 6.436
- 6.446
- 6.456
- 6.466
- 6.476
- 6.486
- 6.496
- 6.506
- 6.516
- 6.526
- 6.536
- 6.546
- 6.556
- 6.566
- 6.576
- 6.586
- 6.596
- 6.606
- 6.616
- 6.626
- 6.636
- 6.646
- 6.656
- 6.666
- 6.676
- 6.686